What Is Tear?
Tear strength testing measures the force required to advance a previously made cut in the material. It is a different property from tensile strength: the rupture test shows the load-carrying capacity of the entire material, and the tear test shows the resistance of an existing damage to propagation. In use, damage often starts from a small cut, so tear resistance is more decisive in practice. Different standards are used in textiles and leather and their results are not comparable.
Purpose of Tear
The purpose is to determine how well the fabric resists the growth of minor damage that occurs in use and to verify specification compliance.
Which Products Is Tear Applied To?
- Outerwear and workwear fabrics
- Home textile and upholstery fabrics
- Tents, awnings and tarpaulins
- Technical and industrial textiles
- coated fabrics
- Shoe upper leathers and saddlery leathers
In Which Sectors Is Tear Used?
Standards Related to Tear
- TS EN ISO 13937-1 (textile — ballistic pendulum, Elmendorf)
- TS EN ISO 13937-2 (textile — trouser-shaped sample, single tear)
- TS EN ISO 13937-3 (textile — wing-shaped sample)
- TS EN ISO 13937-4 (textile — tongue-shaped sample, double tear)
- ASTM D1424 (Elmendorf)
- ASTM D2261 (tongue tear)
- TS EN ISO 3377-1 / -2 (leather — single and double edge tearing load)
- TS EN ISO 2418 / 2419 (leather — sampling and conditioning)
Tear Conditions
- Conditioning
- ISO 139 in textiles (20 °C ± 2 °C, 65 ± 4% relative humidity); ISO 2419 on leather
- Orientation
- In textile, warp and weft, in leather, parallel and perpendicular directions to the spine are measured separately.
- Method selection
- The pendulum method is suitable for thin fabrics, the methods with a pulling device are suitable for heavy fabrics and leather.
- Thickness
- The result on the skin depends on the thickness; Thickness is measured and reported
Equipment for Tear
- Elmendorf ballistic pendulum device
- Constant elongation rapid tensile tester
- Tear test jaws and pins (for leather)
- Sample cutting die and templates
- Thickness gauge
- Conditioning chamber
Sample Requirements for Tear
- Separate sample sets for each direction (warp/weft in textile, parallel/perpendicular to the spine in leather)
- The number of repetitions prescribed by the standard (varies depending on the method)
- Textile samples should be cut by sliding so that they do not contain the same warp or weft threads.
- The skin sample should be taken from the area defined in ISO 2418 and its thickness should be measured.
- The initial incision should be made at the length and position defined in the standard.
Duration of Tear
The experiment itself is short; sample preparation and conditioning determine the duration. As the number of methods and directions increases, the total time increases.
Tear Procedure
- 1The samples are conditioned and cut by marking according to direction.
- 2The initial incision defined in the standard is opened.
- 3The sample is connected to the device as prescribed by the standard.
- 4The pendulum is released or the jaws are separated at the defined speed.
- 5The tear force is recorded; In methods with tensile devices, the peak values are averaged.
- 6Results for each direction are reported separately.
Tear Acceptance Criteria
The acceptance criterion is the minimum force value in the product standard or customer specification. The test standard defines the method, not the passing value.
Evaluation of Results
Directional results are evaluated separately; usually one is significantly lower and determines the weakness of the product. Results obtained with different methods (pendulum, tongue, single/double edge) cannot be compared numerically; The specification should clearly state which part of which standard is required.
Tear Report
- Sample description, material type and structure
- Applied standard section and sample format
- Individual and average force values (N) for each direction
- Skin thickness and N/mm result if necessary
- Standard deviation and coefficient of variation
- Conditioning conditions
Accreditation
EUROLAB holds internationally recognised accreditation obtained from accreditation bodies party to the IAF and ILAC multilateral recognition arrangements, under ISO/IEC 17025 for laboratory testing, ISO/IEC 17020 for inspection and surveillance, and ISO/IEC 17021-1 and ISO/IEC 17065 for system and product certification. This chain ensures the reports and certificates issued are accepted worldwide.
Whether this test can be offered within accredited scope depends on your product and the standard applied; since accreditation is method-based, the scope is confirmed in writing at the quotation stage.
Scope and authorisationsRelated Regulations
- EU 1007/2011 (textile fibre names and labelling)
- EU 1907/2006 REACH Annex XVII (restricted substances in textiles)
- Regulation on the Naming of Textile Products
Tekstil Testleri — What Does This Testing Field Cover?
The section below describes the field that the Tear test belongs to; the conditions and acceptance criteria of this particular test are given in the sections above. The scope specific to your product is confirmed in writing at the quotation stage.
Textile testing answers two questions separately: does the fabric hold up physically over its service life, and does it carry any substance restricted for human health? These two axes require different laboratory infrastructure and different decision mechanisms.
On the physical side, breaking and tear strength, abrasion resistance, pilling, dimensional change, colour fastness and water and oil repellency are measured. Most of these tests depend on the USE SCENARIO: Martindale abrasion cycles are decisive for an upholstery fabric, while dimensional change in washing and colour fastness come to the fore for a shirting fabric. The same fabric goes through a different test set for a different use.
Colour fastness is a body of work of its own in this field and is not a single test. The fastness of the same fabric to light, washing, rubbing, perspiration, saliva, chlorinated water and ironing is measured separately; each represents a different moment of use. Results are rated from 1 to 5 on the grey scale and the specification gives a separate minimum rating for each agent.
On the chemical side, aromatic amines released from azo dyes, formaldehyde, heavy metals, phthalates, short-chain chlorinated paraffins, alkylphenols and PFAS compounds are screened. These items come from REACH restrictions, brand restricted substance lists (RSL) and voluntary schemes such as OEKO-TEX. Brand lists are often stricter than legislation; the target customer is decisive.
There is NO CE marking on consumer textiles. The obligation has three legs: fibre composition and care labelling, compliance with chemical restrictions, and general product safety. Textiles claiming a protective function (workwear, flame-resistant clothing, high-visibility clothing) fall under personal protective equipment legislation, where CE is mandatory — this distinction is commercially critical.
Verifying the label declaration is the most routine work in the field. Quantitative fibre analysis confirms the blend ratio stated on the label; tolerance ranges are defined in legislation. An incorrect fibre declaration both misleads the consumer and affects customs classification.
Sustainability claims have added a new body of work to the field in recent years: verification of recycled content (GRS, RCS), organic content (GOTS), restriction of harmful chemicals and water/energy footprint declarations. These claims now require auditable evidence.
Method groups in this field
Strength and durability
Strip and grab breaking strength, tearing by the Elmendorf and tongue methods, seam strength, bursting strength.
Abrasion and surface
Martindale and rotary platform abrasion, pilling and fuzzing, fabric mass and thread density measurements.
Dimensional stability
Dimensional change in washing and drying, wrinkling behaviour, appearance after ironing.
Colour fastness
Fastness to light (xenon), washing, rubbing, perspiration, saliva, water and chlorinated water; rating on the grey scale.
Functional properties
Water repellency (spray test), oil repellency, waterproofness, air permeability, effectiveness of antibacterial finishes, UV protection factor.
Chemical analyses
Aromatic amines from azo dyes, formaldehyde, pH, heavy metals, phthalates, chlorinated phenols, PFAS and alkylphenols.
Commonly confused in this field
- A brand restricted substance list (RSL) may be stricter than legislation; REACH compliance does not mean compliance with the customer specification.
- Textiles claiming a protective function fall under PPE legislation and require CE; an ordinary textile test report does not satisfy that file.
- Colour fastness is not a single number; a rating cannot be interpreted without stating which agent it relates to.
- A result obtained for a fabric does not cover the whole garment made from it; lining, sewing thread, print and trims are assessed separately.
- Performance claims after washing are valid together with the stated number of wash cycles; the word "permanent" on its own is not verifiable.
Which decisions these results support
- Compliance with the brand restricted substance list (RSL)
- Verification of label declarations: fibre composition and care instructions
- Determining the performance class of upholstery and technical textiles
- Pre-import shipment inspection and lot acceptance
- Supporting sustainability and recycled content claims
Related Tests
Frequently Asked Questions About Tear
If the tensile strength is high, will the tearing also be high?
It may not happen. A tightly woven fabric may have high tensile strength but low tear strength; Since the threads cannot move, the load is concentrated at a single point. The two properties are measured separately.
Which method should I choose?
If your specification specifies a method, it is used. If not, the material and weight are decisive: The Elmendorf pendulum has a limited capacity and is inadequate for heavy fabrics; In this case, the trouser or tongue method with a traction device is preferred. For leather, ISO 3377 is used.
Is the leather result comparable to the fabric result?
Incomparable. ISO 13937 and ISO 3377 use different sample geometry and different loading methods. Even within the same product family, only results obtained with the same part of the same standard are compared.








