Loading

Defence Testing · MIL

MIL-STD-202 Compliance Tests

MIL-STD-202
Savunma Testleri laboratory work

What Is MIL-STD-202 Compliance Tests?

MIL-STD-202 defines standard test methods for electronic components such as resistors, capacitors, connectors and switches. A component specification refers to this standard to state which method applies under which condition; the standard itself sets no limits — it describes the method.

Purpose of MIL-STD-202 Compliance Tests

The purpose is to ensure component-level tests are carried out the same way across different laboratories, so components made to the same specification by different manufacturers become comparable.

Which Products Is MIL-STD-202 Compliance Tests Applied To?

  • Resistors, capacitors and inductors
  • Connectors and terminals
  • Switches and relays
  • Cable and wire products
  • Printed circuit board components

In Which Sectors Is MIL-STD-202 Compliance Tests Used?

DefenceAerospaceMaritimeElectronics

Standards Related to MIL-STD-202 Compliance Tests

  • MIL-STD-202Testing methods in electronic parts test

MIL-STD-202 Compliance Tests Conditions

Method selection
The method numbers referenced by the component specification
Test classes
Environmental (humidity, temperature, salt fog), physical (vibration, shock, terminal strength) and electrical methods
Conditions
Each method's letter-designated condition options; the choice comes from the specification
Sampling plan
The sampling and acceptance plan in the specification

Equipment for MIL-STD-202 Compliance Tests

  • Climate and humidity chambers
  • Vibration shaker and shock rig
  • Salt fog chamber
  • Terminal strength and solderability rigs
  • Electrical measurement and insulation test instruments

Sample Requirements for MIL-STD-202 Compliance Tests

  • The specimen must represent the final configuration of the design being qualified.
  • The product's environmental life cycle profile and procurement specification must be supplied together with the test.
  • If the unit is to be operated during the test, power, load and monitoring interfaces must be provided.
  • The functional check procedure and success criterion must be provided in writing by the manufacturer.
  • Tests may be destructive; the qualification specimen must be set aside from series use.

Duration of MIL-STD-202 Compliance Tests

Duration depends on the set of methods applied. Humidity and life tests take days to weeks, while most physical methods are completed within a day.

MIL-STD-202 Compliance Tests Procedure

  1. 1The component specification is reviewed and the methods to apply are listed.
  2. 2The number of specimens and the acceptance plan are determined.
  3. 3Electrical measurements are taken before the test.
  4. 4Methods are applied in the order given in the specification.
  5. 5Interim measurements are taken at the points the method requires.
  6. 6Post-test electrical measurements and visual inspection are performed.
  7. 7Results are compared against the acceptance criteria in the specification.

MIL-STD-202 Compliance Tests Acceptance Criteria

The severity level and acceptance criterion come not from the method standard but from the specification the product is subject to: for MIL-STD-810 applications, the product's environmental life cycle profile and procurement specification are decisive; for DO-160 applications, it is the category corresponding to the equipment's installation zone on the aircraft. This page therefore gives no numerical limit.

Evaluation of Results

The assessment relies on the change between pre- and post-test electrical values staying within the specification's limits and the absence of the defined defect type on visual inspection. Limits come from the component specification, not the standard.

MIL-STD-202 Compliance Tests Report

  • Equipment identification, part number and configuration
  • Standard, revision and method/section number applied
  • Selected severity level or category and its basis
  • Test rig, mounting arrangement and measurement points
  • Functional checks performed before, during and after the test
  • Measurement results, observations and photographs
  • Non-conformities and any test deviations
  • A statement that the result applies only to the specimen submitted for testing

Accreditation

EUROLAB holds internationally recognised accreditation obtained from accreditation bodies party to the IAF and ILAC multilateral recognition arrangements, under ISO/IEC 17025 for laboratory testing, ISO/IEC 17020 for inspection and surveillance, and ISO/IEC 17021-1 and ISO/IEC 17065 for system and product certification. This chain ensures the reports and certificates issued are accepted worldwide.

Whether this test can be offered within accredited scope depends on your product and the standard applied; since accreditation is method-based, the scope is confirmed in writing at the quotation stage.

Scope and authorisations

Related Regulations

  • MIL-STD-810 (environmental engineering considerations and laboratory tests)
  • The procuring authority's technical specification and qualification plan
  • AQAP / NATO quality assurance requirements (where applicable)

Savunma Testleri — What Does This Testing Field Cover?

The section below describes the field that the MIL-STD-202 Compliance Tests test belongs to; the conditions and acceptance criteria of this particular test are given in the sections above. The scope specific to your product is confirmed in writing at the quotation stage.

Defence testing shows that equipment keeps working in a military mission environment. What distinguishes it from civil testing is not only the severity of the levels; the ASSUMPTION ITSELF is different. The equipment must work on the first attempt, after months of storage, in an environment where maintenance is not available, inside a platform crowded with its own transmitters and receivers.

This assumption shapes the test plan. For a civil product "normal use" can be defined; for military equipment what is defined is the LIFE CYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE: the exposure of every stage is listed — from manufacture to storage, from storage to shipment, to transport on a vehicle, to use in the field and to maintenance — and the testing is derived from that list.

On the environmental side, MIL-STD-810 methods are applied: temperature, humidity, altitude, rain, sand and dust, salt fog, fungus, shock, vibration, explosive atmosphere and gunfire vibration. The standard itself sets no acceptance criterion; which method is applied at which level, and what is acceptable, come from the programme specification.

On the electromagnetic side, MIL-STD-461 requirements come into play and interference within the platform is controlled. It measures the same physics as civil EMC but with a different assumption: the equipment will operate on a platform crowded with its own radars and radios, and interference inside the platform puts the mission directly at risk. The limits are therefore far stricter.

Power quality is a separate body of work. MIL-STD-1275 for military vehicles and MIL-STD-704 for aircraft define the supply characteristics: voltage ranges, transients, ripple and interruption behaviour. This is where commercially derived equipment most often gets stuck when integrated into a military platform.

On the shock side, naval vessels carry their own regime: the MIL-S-901 high-impact shock test simulates the effect of an underwater explosion and tests the equipment on a real impact machine. This is an entirely different scale from classical laboratory shock testing.

The suitability of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) equipment for military use is a growing subject in the field. Cost and lead time pressures encourage the use of commercial products; but a commercial product is not considered suitable unless it has been through the military profile, and a gap analysis plus additional qualification is required.

In this family the test plan comes from the PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION. The phrase "complies with MIL-STD-810" is therefore not a verifiable claim on its own; which method, which procedure, which level and which revision must all be answered.

Method groups in this field

  • Environmental

    MIL-STD-810 methods: temperature, humidity, altitude, solar radiation, rain, sand and dust, fungus, salt fog, immersion, explosive atmosphere.

  • Mechanical

    Vibration (random, sine, gunfire), shock, acceleration, free fall and transport simulation.

  • Electromagnetic

    MIL-STD-461 CE/CS/RE/RS requirements; MIL-STD-464 at platform level.

  • Power quality

    Conformity to the MIL-STD-1275 vehicle and MIL-STD-704 aircraft supply characteristics.

  • High-impact shock

    The MIL-S-901 naval shock test; simulation of the effect of an underwater explosion.

  • Component qualification

    MIL-STD-883 microelectronics and MIL-STD-202 electronic parts test methods.

Commonly confused in this field

  • The phrase "MIL-STD-810 certified" is incorrect; the standard produces no certificate, the output is a qualification report.
  • A conformity claim that does not state the method, procedure and level cannot be verified.
  • The revision letter (F, G, H) changes the content of methods and the procedure numbers; the specification must state the revision.
  • A civil EMC report does not replace MIL-STD-461; the limits, distances and set-ups are different.
  • Power quality is the requirement most often skipped when integrating a commercial product into a military platform.
  • Applying a method does not show that the equipment maintains its function in that environment; the functional acceptance criterion is defined separately.

Which decisions these results support

  • Qualification under a supply contract
  • Component verification before platform integration
  • Suitability of commercially derived equipment for military use and gap analysis
  • Specification compliance in NATO and export programmes
  • Establishing the life cycle environmental profile

Related Tests

Frequently Asked Questions About MIL-STD-202 Compliance Tests

Does MIL-STD-202 give an acceptance criterion?

No. It only defines how the test is performed. The acceptance criterion is in the component's own specification (e.g. the MIL-PRF series).

How does it differ from MIL-STD-810?

MIL-STD-202 defines environmental tests at the component level, MIL-STD-810 at the system/equipment level. Scale and setup differ.

We use cookies required for the site to work. With your permission we also add an analytics cookie to understand how pages are used. Cookie Policy