MIL-STD-167 Compliance Tests – MIL-STD-167

What Is MIL-STD-167 Compliance Tests?

MIL-STD-167 defines vibration requirements for equipment used on naval platforms. Part 1 of the standard addresses equipment withstanding shipboard environmental vibration, and Part 2 addresses the vibration rotating machinery itself produces staying within limits (balance).

Purpose of MIL-STD-167 Compliance Tests

The purpose is to ensure sustained vibration from the propeller and main machinery does not fail equipment on the ship, and that the equipment itself does not transmit unacceptable vibration to the ship.

Which Products Is MIL-STD-167 Compliance Tests Applied To?

Shipboard electronic and control units
Pumps, fans and rotating machinery
Electrical panels and distribution equipment
Navigation and communication equipment
Mounting bases and vibration isolators

In Which Sectors Is MIL-STD-167 Compliance Tests Used?

DefenceAerospaceMaritimeElectronics

Standards Related to MIL-STD-167 Compliance Tests

MIL-STD-167mechanical vibration in ship equipment test

MIL-STD-167 Compliance Tests Conditions

Test type: Exploratory vibration, endurance, and balance measurement if required
Frequency range and amplitude: From the specification, according to ship class and installation zone
Axes: Separately in three orthogonal axes
Resonance: Endurance is applied at the resonance frequencies found during the exploratory scan

Equipment for MIL-STD-167 Compliance Tests

Electrodynamic or mechanical vibration shaker
Accelerometers and vibration control system
Mounting fixtures
Functional monitoring rig
Rotation speed and vibration measurement equipment for balance measurement

Sample Requirements for MIL-STD-167 Compliance Tests

The specimen must represent the final configuration of the design being qualified.
The product's environmental life cycle profile and procurement specification must be supplied together with the test.
If the unit is to be operated during the test, power, load and monitoring interfaces must be provided.
The functional check procedure and success criterion must be provided in writing by the manufacturer.
Tests may be destructive; the qualification specimen must be set aside from series use.

Duration of MIL-STD-167 Compliance Tests

A study run in three axes with exploratory and endurance stages usually takes several days; fixture preparation also takes time.

MIL-STD-167 Compliance Tests Procedure

1The equipment's installation zone and class on the ship are determined.
2A specimen-specific fixture is prepared and accelerometers are placed.
3A functional check is performed before the test.
4A frequency scan is performed to determine resonances.
5Endurance is applied at the resonance frequencies found.
6The steps are repeated in each axis.
7Post-test inspection and a functional check are performed.

MIL-STD-167 Compliance Tests Acceptance Criteria

The severity level and acceptance criterion come not from the method standard but from the specification the product is subject to: for MIL-STD-810 applications, the product's environmental life cycle profile and procurement specification are decisive; for DO-160 applications, it is the category corresponding to the equipment's installation zone on the aircraft. This page therefore gives no numerical limit.

Evaluation of Results

The result is assessed on the equipment maintaining function during and after the test, with no structural damage or loosening. In the balance test, the measured vibration amplitude is compared against the specification limit.

MIL-STD-167 Compliance Tests Report

Equipment identification, part number and configuration
Standard, revision and method/section number applied
Selected severity level or category and its basis
Test rig, mounting arrangement and measurement points
Functional checks performed before, during and after the test
Measurement results, observations and photographs
Non-conformities and any test deviations
A statement that the result applies only to the specimen submitted for testing

Accreditation

EUROLAB holds internationally recognised accreditation obtained from accreditation bodies party to the IAF and ILAC multilateral recognition arrangements, under ISO/IEC 17025 for laboratory testing, ISO/IEC 17020 for inspection and surveillance, and ISO/IEC 17021-1 and ISO/IEC 17065 for system and product certification. This chain ensures the reports and certificates issued are accepted worldwide.

Whether this test can be offered within accredited scope depends on your product and the standard applied; since accreditation is method-based, the scope is confirmed in writing at the quotation stage.

Scope and authorisations

Related Regulations

MIL-STD-810 (environmental engineering considerations and laboratory tests)
The procuring authority's technical specification and qualification plan
AQAP / NATO quality assurance requirements (where applicable)

Savunma Testleri — What Does This Testing Field Cover?

The section below describes the field that the MIL-STD-167 Compliance Tests test belongs to; the conditions and acceptance criteria of this particular test are given in the sections above. The scope specific to your product is confirmed in writing at the quotation stage.

Defence testing shows that equipment keeps working in a military mission environment. What distinguishes it from civil testing is not only the severity of the levels; the ASSUMPTION ITSELF is different. The equipment must work on the first attempt, after months of storage, in an environment where maintenance is not available, inside a platform crowded with its own transmitters and receivers.

This assumption shapes the test plan. For a civil product "normal use" can be defined; for military equipment what is defined is the LIFE CYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE: the exposure of every stage is listed — from manufacture to storage, from storage to shipment, to transport on a vehicle, to use in the field and to maintenance — and the testing is derived from that list.

On the environmental side, MIL-STD-810 methods are applied: temperature, humidity, altitude, rain, sand and dust, salt fog, fungus, shock, vibration, explosive atmosphere and gunfire vibration. The standard itself sets no acceptance criterion; which method is applied at which level, and what is acceptable, come from the programme specification.

On the electromagnetic side, MIL-STD-461 requirements come into play and interference within the platform is controlled. It measures the same physics as civil EMC but with a different assumption: the equipment will operate on a platform crowded with its own radars and radios, and interference inside the platform puts the mission directly at risk. The limits are therefore far stricter.

Power quality is a separate body of work. MIL-STD-1275 for military vehicles and MIL-STD-704 for aircraft define the supply characteristics: voltage ranges, transients, ripple and interruption behaviour. This is where commercially derived equipment most often gets stuck when integrated into a military platform.

On the shock side, naval vessels carry their own regime: the MIL-S-901 high-impact shock test simulates the effect of an underwater explosion and tests the equipment on a real impact machine. This is an entirely different scale from classical laboratory shock testing.

The suitability of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) equipment for military use is a growing subject in the field. Cost and lead time pressures encourage the use of commercial products; but a commercial product is not considered suitable unless it has been through the military profile, and a gap analysis plus additional qualification is required.

In this family the test plan comes from the PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION. The phrase "complies with MIL-STD-810" is therefore not a verifiable claim on its own; which method, which procedure, which level and which revision must all be answered.

Method groups in this field

Environmental
MIL-STD-810 methods: temperature, humidity, altitude, solar radiation, rain, sand and dust, fungus, salt fog, immersion, explosive atmosphere.
Mechanical
Vibration (random, sine, gunfire), shock, acceleration, free fall and transport simulation.
Electromagnetic
MIL-STD-461 CE/CS/RE/RS requirements; MIL-STD-464 at platform level.
Power quality
Conformity to the MIL-STD-1275 vehicle and MIL-STD-704 aircraft supply characteristics.
High-impact shock
The MIL-S-901 naval shock test; simulation of the effect of an underwater explosion.
Component qualification
MIL-STD-883 microelectronics and MIL-STD-202 electronic parts test methods.

Commonly confused in this field

The phrase "MIL-STD-810 certified" is incorrect; the standard produces no certificate, the output is a qualification report.
A conformity claim that does not state the method, procedure and level cannot be verified.
The revision letter (F, G, H) changes the content of methods and the procedure numbers; the specification must state the revision.
A civil EMC report does not replace MIL-STD-461; the limits, distances and set-ups are different.
Power quality is the requirement most often skipped when integrating a commercial product into a military platform.
Applying a method does not show that the equipment maintains its function in that environment; the functional acceptance criterion is defined separately.

Which decisions these results support

Qualification under a supply contract
Component verification before platform integration
Suitability of commercially derived equipment for military use and gap analysis
Specification compliance in NATO and export programmes
Establishing the life cycle environmental profile

Related Tests

Frequently Asked Questions About MIL-STD-167 Compliance Tests

Why is the exploratory scan done first?

The equipment's resonance frequencies are not known in advance. The scan finds these frequencies, so the endurance stage is applied at the most demanding point.

Is it required together with MIL-S-901?

Usually yes. MIL-STD-167 addresses sustained vibration and MIL-S-901 addresses explosion-induced shock; for shipboard equipment the two cover different phenomena.