Loading

Corrosion Tests · Corrosion tests

Neutral Salt Spray

ISO 9227ASTM B117ASTM G85ASTM G48ISO 16701ISO 6270SAE J2334VDA 233-102
Corrosion Tests laboratory work

What Is Neutral Salt Spray?

The neutral salt spray (NSS) test is an accelerated corrosion test in which the sample is continuously exposed to a 5% sodium chloride fog held at a neutral pH. It is the basic and most common form of salt spray testing.

Purpose of Neutral Salt Spray

The purpose is to comparatively determine the protection duration of metal and coated surfaces in a corrosive environment, and to check coating quality and specification compliance.

Which Products Is Neutral Salt Spray Applied To?

  • Galvanised and zinc-coated parts
  • Painted and powder-coated metal surfaces
  • Fasteners
  • Automotive body and chassis components
  • Outdoor hardware

In Which Sectors Is Neutral Salt Spray Used?

AutomotiveMetalSteelConstructionMaritime

Standards Related to Neutral Salt Spray

  • ISO 9227tuz sisi korozyon testi test
  • ASTM B117tuz sisi (salt spray) korozyon testi test
  • ASTM G85modified salt fog (cyclic) test test
  • ASTM G48pitting and crevice corrosion in stainless steels test
  • ISO 16701cyclic corrosion test test
  • ISO 6270strength in condensation environment test
  • SAE J2334cyclic laboratory corrosion testing test
  • VDA 233-102cyclic corrosion testing in automotive test

Neutral Salt Spray Conditions

Solution
5% ± 1% NaCl (by mass)
pH
6.5 – 7.2 in solution collected at 35 °C
cabin temperature
35 °C ± 2 °C
Sis toplama debisi
80 cm² yatay alanda 1,0 – 2,0 mL/saat
sample angle
15° – 25° from vertical

Equipment for Neutral Salt Spray

  • Salt fog chamber
  • Atomiser and humidified compressed air
  • pH and conductivity meter
  • Fog collection funnels

Sample Requirements for Neutral Salt Spray

  • At least three samples are generally recommended
  • The surface must be cleaned and dried before the test
  • Cut edges must be properly masked
  • If a scribe is required for evaluation, it must be made in accordance with the standard before the test

Duration of Neutral Salt Spray

Applied in stages such as 24, 48, 96, 240, 480, 720 or 1000 hours depending on the specification. Duration is set by the product standard or customer specification.

Neutral Salt Spray Procedure

  1. 1Samples are cleaned, marked and masked if necessary.
  2. 2Chamber temperature, solution pH and fog rate are verified.
  3. 3Samples are placed on the rack at the defined angle.
  4. 4Fog is applied continuously for the defined duration.
  5. 5Observations are recorded at interim checkpoints.
  6. 6At the end of the exposure, samples are washed, dried and evaluated.

Neutral Salt Spray Acceptance Criteria

The acceptance criterion is defined in the product standard or customer specification. Common criteria are no red rust visible after a defined period, and no spread beyond a defined number of millimetres around the scribe.

Evaluation of Results

Blistering, rust and scribe spread are graded by visual inspection. Results are comparative; values obtained in different chambers cannot be matched one-to-one.

Neutral Salt Spray Report

  • Applied standard and revision
  • Chamber conditions and verification records
  • Exposure duration and interim observations
  • Sample description and photographs
  • Assessment result

Accreditation

EUROLAB holds internationally recognised accreditation obtained from accreditation bodies party to the IAF and ILAC multilateral recognition arrangements, under ISO/IEC 17025 for laboratory testing, ISO/IEC 17020 for inspection and surveillance, and ISO/IEC 17021-1 and ISO/IEC 17065 for system and product certification. This chain ensures the reports and certificates issued are accepted worldwide.

Whether this test can be offered within accredited scope depends on your product and the standard applied; since accreditation is method-based, the scope is confirmed in writing at the quotation stage.

Scope and authorisations

Related Regulations

  • Automotive OEM standards
  • Coating product specifications

Corrosion Tests — What Does This Testing Field Cover?

The section below describes the field that the Neutral Salt Spray test belongs to; the conditions and acceptance criteria of this particular test are given in the sections above. The scope specific to your product is confirmed in writing at the quotation stage.

Corrosion testing assesses under accelerated conditions how long metals and coatings last in a corrosive environment. The family contains two approaches, and the difference between them is the most important knowledge in the field: constant-condition tests and cyclic tests.

Constant-condition salt spray (ASTM B117, ISO 9227) maintains the same environment in the chamber throughout: the same salt concentration, the same temperature, a continuously wet surface. The strength of this approach is its REPEATABILITY; because the conditions are tightly defined, results from different laboratories come out close to one another. That is exactly the property wanted when monitoring production consistency and comparing suppliers.

But the real atmosphere is not constant. A surface gets wet, dries, warms, cools, takes UV and becomes soiled. The wet-dry cycle changes the corrosion mechanism: during drying the salt concentrates, oxygen access increases and corrosion accelerates. The form of damage on a continuously wet surface differs from that on a cyclically wetted one.

Cyclic tests (SAE J2334, VDA 233-102, ASTM G85, ISO 16701) imitate this variability and give results closer to the damage patterns seen in the field. The automotive sector has largely moved to this approach. The practical consequence is this: the same two coatings may RANK DIFFERENTLY in constant and cyclic tests; which test was applied determines the result.

No test in this family defines a DURATION OR ACCEPTANCE CRITERION. How many hours it is applied for and what level of damage is acceptable come from the product standard or the customer specification. The assessment scales are defined in separate standards: different scales are used for degree of rusting, blistering, creep from a scribe and loss of adhesion.

The damage looked for varies with the coating type. For metallic coatings, white rust (corrosion of the coating itself) and red rust (corrosion reaching the base metal) are reported separately, and specifications usually give a separate duration for each. On painted surfaces, creep from a scribe and blistering come to the fore.

Electrochemical methods are a separate body of work and answer a different question. Potentiodynamic polarisation, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and pitting potential measurements reveal the MECHANISM and rate of corrosion within hours; chamber tests give the result visually over weeks. The two are complementary rather than alternatives.

Stainless steels have a special sub-body in the field: pitting and crevice corrosion and intergranular corrosion tests indicate the quality of the heat treatment and the condition after welding.

Method groups in this field

  • Constant-condition salt spray

    ASTM B117 and ISO 9227 (NSS); for repeatable comparison and process control.

  • Acidified and accelerated

    The AASS and CASS conditions of ISO 9227; preferred for decorative chromium-nickel coatings.

  • Cyclic corrosion

    SAE J2334, VDA 233-102, ASTM G85 and ISO 16701; approaches field behaviour through wet-dry cycles.

  • Humidity and condensation

    Steady damp heat, condensation and cyclic humidity tests; these reveal coating blistering.

  • Electrochemical

    Polarisation, impedance spectroscopy, pitting and crevice corrosion potential measurements.

  • Stainless steel specific tests

    Pitting and crevice corrosion, intergranular corrosion; indicators of heat treatment and weld quality.

  • Assessment scales

    Scales for degree of rusting, blistering, creep from a scribe and loss of adhesion; the ratings come from these standards.

Commonly confused in this field

  • Chamber hours cannot be converted into field life; there is no reliable conversion factor.
  • Constant and cyclic tests can produce different rankings; whichever the specification states is the one applied.
  • A corrosion report without a stated duration and acceptance criterion cannot be interpreted.
  • If the coating thickness is not reported, the result cannot be compared; thickness directly affects durability.
  • White rust and red rust say different things; the two must be reported separately.
  • The position and angle of the specimen in the chamber affect the result; standards govern this and the report must document it.

Which decisions these results support

  • Selection of the coating system and supplier approval
  • Process control of the coating line and lot acceptance
  • Evidence of durability for automotive and outdoor products
  • Assessment of field corrosion damage and warranty decisions
  • Verification of heat treatment and weld quality in stainless steel

Related Tests

Frequently Asked Questions About Neutral Salt Spray

What is the difference between NSS, AASS and CASS?

All three are salt spray tests. NSS uses a pH-neutral solution at 35 °C. AASS is acidified with acetic acid to pH 3.1–3.3. CASS adds copper chloride to the acetic acid solution and runs at 50 °C, making it the most aggressive.

We use cookies required for the site to work. With your permission we also add an analytics cookie to understand how pages are used. Cookie Policy